Pharmacotherapy considerations for patients who develop acute kidney injury during cancer therapy.

INTRODUCTION: Acute kidney injury (AKI) frequently develops in patients receiving cancer therapy and requires a wide differential diagnosis due to possible role of unique cancer and drug-related factors, in addition to common pre- and post-renal causes. Rapid development of new molecular targeted anti-cancer drugs and immunotherapies has opened unprecedented possibilities of treatment at the price of an increased spectrum of renal side effects. AREAS COVERED: The present review aims at providing a state-of-the-art picture of AKI in cancer patient (PubMed and Embase libraries were searched from inception to January 2024), with a focus on differential diagnosis and management of diverse clinical settings. Reports of parenchymal AKI due to glomerular, microvascular, tubular and interstitial damage have been constantly increasing. Complex electrolyte and acid-base disorders can coexist. The role of renal biopsy and possible therapeutic approaches are also discussed. EXPERT OPINION: Onconephrology has become an important subspecialty of clinical nephrology, requiring constantly updated skills and a high degree of interdisciplinary integration to tackle diagnostic challenges and even therapeutic and ethical dilemmas. Integrated onconephrological guidelines and availability of biomarkers may provide new tools for management of this unique type of patients in the near future.

Treatment of bone metastases from solid tumors with bone-modifying agents: a web survey of Italian oncologists investigating patterns of practice drug prescription and prevention of side effects.

PURPOSE: Optimal use of bone-modifying agents (BMAs) in patients with bone metastases from solid tumors is uncertain in some aspects: the drug choice; the planned treatment duration and long-term therapy; the prevention and management of possible side effects, including renal toxicity, hypocalcaemia, and medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ). METHODS: Italian oncologists were invited to fulfil a 24-question web survey about prescription of BMAs for bone metastases of breast cancer, prostate cancer, and other solid tumors. Prevention and management of side effects were also investigated. RESULTS: Answers of 191 oncologists were collected. BMAs are usually prescribed at the time of diagnosis of bone metastases by 87.0% (breast cancer) and 76.1% (solid tumors except breast and prostate cancers) of oncologists; the decision is more articulated for prostate cancer (endocrine-sensitive versus castration-resistant). The creatinine level (32.3%), the availability of patient venous access (15.8%), and the type of primary neoplasm (13.6%) are the most reported factors involved in choice between bisphosphonates and denosumab. Zoledronic acid every 3 months was considered as a valid alternative to monthly administration by 94% of Italian oncologists. Oncologists reported a good confidence with measures aimed to prevent MRONJ, whereas uncertainness about prevention and management of hypocalcemia was registered. CONCLUSION: Italian oncologists showed a high attitude in prescribing bisphosphonates or denosumab at the time of diagnosis of bone metastases, with a large application of preventive measures of side effects. Further studies are needed to investigate some controversial aspects, such as optimal drug treatment duration and long-term drug schedules.

Previous immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy is associated with decreased COVID-19-related hospitalizations and complications in patients with cancer: Results of a propensity-matched analysis of the OnCovid registry.

OBJECTIVES: To date, studies have not provided definitive answers regarding whether previous immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) treatment alters outcomes for cancer patients with COVID-19. METHODS: The OnCovid registry (NCT04393974) was searched from February 27, 2020, to January 31, 2022, for patients who received systemic anti-cancer therapy in the 4 weeks before laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 diagnosis. Propensity-score matching using country, vaccination status, primary tumor type, sex, age, comorbidity burden, tumor stage, and remission status investigated differences in predefined clinical outcomes comparing those who had or had not received ICIs. RESULTS: Of 3523 patients screened, 137 ICI-only and 1378 non-ICI met inclusion criteria. Before matching, ICI patients were older, male, enrolled at centers in Italy, and had histories of smoking, thoracic cancers, advanced cancer stages, and active malignancies (P ≤0.02). After matching, there were 120 ICI and 322 non-ICI patients. ICI patients had no differences (odds ratio: 95% CI) in presenting COVID-19 symptoms (0.69: 0.37-1.28), receipt of COVID-specific therapy (0.88: 0.54-1.41), 14-day (0.95: 0.56-1.61), or 28-day (0.79: 0.48-1.29) mortalities. However, ICI patients required less COVID-19-related hospitalization (0.37: 0.21-0.67) and oxygen therapy (0.51: 0.31-0.83) and developed fewer complications (0.57: 0.36-0.92). CONCLUSION: In this propensity-score matched analysis, previous ICI therapy did not worsen and potentially improved COVID-19 outcomes in patients with cancer.

SNP of Aromatase Predict Long-term Survival and Aromatase Inhibitor Toxicity in Patients with Early Breast Cancer: A Biomarker Analysis of the GIM4 and GIM5 Trials.

PURPOSE: In estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) breast cancer, single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) in the aromatase gene might affect aromatase inhibitors (AI) metabolism and efficacy. Here, we assessed the impact of SNP on prognosis and toxicity of patients receiving adjuvant letrozole. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: We enrolled 886 postmenopausal patients in the study. They were treated with letrozole for 2 to 5 years after taking tamoxifen for 2 to 6 years, continuing until they completed 5 to 10 years of therapy. Germline DNA was genotyped for SNP rs4646, rs10046, rs749292, and rs727479. Log-rank test and Cox model were used for disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). Cumulative incidence (CI) of breast cancer metastasis was assessed through competing risk analysis, with contralateral breast cancer, second malignancies and non-breast cancer death as competing events. CI of skeletal and cardiovascular events were assessed using DFS events as competing events. Subdistribution HR (sHR) with 95% confidence intervals were calculated through Fine-Gray method. RESULTS: No SNP was associated with DFS. Variants rs10046 [sHR 2.03, (1.04-2.94)], rs749292 [sHR 2.11, (1.12-3.94)], and rs727479 [sHR 2.62, (1.17-5.83)] were associated with breast cancer metastasis. Three groups were identified on the basis of the number of these variants (0, 1, >1). Variant-based groups were associated with breast cancer metastasis (10-year CI 2.5%, 7.6%, 10.7%, P = 0.035) and OS (10-year estimates 96.5%, 93.0%, 89.6%, P = 0.030). Co-occurrence of rs10046 and rs749292 was negatively associated with 10-year CI of skeletal events (3.2% vs. 10%, P = 0.033). A similar association emerged between rs727479 and cardiovascular events (0.3% vs. 2.1%, P = 0.026). CONCLUSIONS: SNP of aromatase gene predict risk of metastasis and AI-related toxicity in ER+ early breast cancer, opening an opportunity for better treatment individualization.

TEAM Study: Upfront Docetaxel Treatment in Patients With Metastatic Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer: A Real-World, Multicenter, Retrospective Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Treatment of metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC) dramatically changed. PEACE-1 and ARASENS trials established triplet therapy efficacy. Identifying prognostic factors supporting treatment choice is pivotal. METHODS: TEAM is an observational, retrospective study to evaluate prognostic role of variables in mHSPC patients receiving upfront docetaxel in 11 Italian centers. Outcome measures were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall-survival (OS). RESULTS: From September 2014 to December 2020, 147 patients were included. Median PFS and OS were 11.6 and 37.4 months. At univariate analysis, PFS-related variables were Gleason Score (GS) (P = .001), opioid use (P = .004), bone metastases number (P < .001), baseline PSA (P = .006), Hb (P < .001), ALP (P < .001) and LDH (P = .002), time between ADT and docetaxel start (P = .018), 3-month PSA (P < .001) and ALP (P < .001), and number of docetaxel cycles (P < .001). OS-related variables were PSA at diagnosis (P = .024), primary tumor treatment (P = .022), baseline pain (P = .015), opioid use (P < .001), bone metastases number (P < . 001), baseline Hb (P < .001), ALP (P < .001) and LDH (P = .001), NLR ratio (P = .039), 3-month PSA (P < .001) and ALP (P < .001) and docetaxel cycles number (P < .001). At multivariate analysis, independent prognostic variables were GS, opioid use, baseline LDH and time between ADT and docetaxel initiation for PFS, and baseline Hb and LDH for OS. CONCLUSION: Patients receiving upfront docetaxel with high GS, high disease burden, pain or opioid use, baseline unfavorable laboratory values had worse outcomes. Patients had greater docetaxel benefit when initiated early after ADT start. These parameters could be taken into account when selecting candidates for triplet therapy.

Genomic Profiling of Primary Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma of the Central Nervous System Suggests Novel Potential Therapeutic Targets.

Primary diffuse large B-cell lymphoma of the primary central nervous system (CNS-DLBCL) is an aggressive disease, with dismal prognosis despite the use of high-dose methotrexate-based polychemotherapy. Our study aimed to expand the biologic profiles of CNS-DLBCL and to correlate them with clinical/imaging findings to gain diagnostic insight and possibly identify new therapeutic targets. We selected 61 CNS-DLBCL whose formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded samples were available at first diagnosis. These were investigated by immunohistochemistry, cMYC rearrangements were explored by fluorescence in situ hybridization, and CNS-DLBCL mutated genes were evaluated by next-generation sequencing. CD10, BCL6, and IRF4 were observed in 16%, 83.6%, and 93% of cases, respectively. As typical of CNS lymphoma, 10 (16.4%) of 61 cases were classified as germinal center (GCB) type and 51 (83.6%) of 61 as non-germinal center (non-GCB) type according to the Hans algorithm. Double-expression status for BCL2 and cMYC was detected in 36 (59%) of 61 cases whereas 25 (41%) of 61 were non-DE. Rearrangement of the cMYC gene was detected in 2 cases, associated with BCL6 translocation only in 1 case MYD88, PIM1, CD79B, and TP53 were mutated in 54.5%, 53.5%, 30.2%, and 18.4% cases, respectively. Novel mutations not previously reported in CNS-DLBCL were found: AIP in 23.1%, PI3KCA in 15%, NOTCH1 in 11.4%, GNAS in 8.1%, CASP8 in 7.9%, EGFR in 6.4%, PTEN in 5.1, and KRAS in 2.6% of cases. Survival was significantly longer for patients with mutated MYD88 (8.7 months vs 1.7 months; log-rank test = 5.43; P = .020) and for patients with mutated CD79B (10.8 months vs 2.5 months; log-rank test = 4.64; P = .031). MYD88 and CD79B predicted a longer survival in patients affected by CNS-DLBCL. Notably, we identified novel mutations that enrich the mutational landscape of CNS-DLBCL, suggest a role of PTEN-PI3K-AKT and receptor tyrosine kinase-RAS-mitogen-activated protein kinase signaling in a subset of CNS-DLBCL, and provide new potential therapeutic targets.

[The time toxicity in cancer patient.] / La tossicità temporale nel paziente oncologico.

Time toxicity in the cancer patient is the time spent undergoing cancer-related medical care, including travel and waiting times. Oncologists don't usually include this information on sharing therapeutic decisions with patients and its impact is not generally evaluated in clinical studies. Time-related burden is most significant in patients with advanced disease and when survival is short; sometimes it may exceed the potential benefit of treatments. All relevant information should be available to the patient to enable her/him to make an informed choice. Because it is difficult to quantify the cost of time, its assessment should be included in clinical trials. Additionally, healthcare organizations should employ resources to minimize the time spent on hospital services and cancer treatments.

COVID-19 in patients with neuroendocrine neoplasms: 2-year results of the INTENSIVE study.

We conducted a retrospective/prospective worldwide study on patients with neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) and a molecularly proven SARS-CoV-2 positivity. Preliminary results regarding 85 patients of the INTENSIVE study have been published in 2021. Now we are reporting the 2-year analysis.Here, we are reporting data from consecutive patients enrolled between 1 June 2020, and 31 May 2022. Among the 118 contacted centers, 25 were active to enroll and 19 actively recruiting at the time of data cut-off for a total of 280 patients enrolled. SARS-CoV-2 positivity occurred in 47.5% of patients in 2020, 35.1% in 2021, and 17.4% in 2022. The median age for COVID-19 diagnosis was 60 years. Well-differentiated tumors, non-functioning, metastatic stage, and gastroenteropancreatic (GEP) primary sites represented most of the NENs. COVID-19-related pneumonia occurred in 22.8% of the total, with 61.3% of them requiring hospitalization; 11 patients (3.9%) needed sub-intensive or intensive care unit therapies and 14 patients died (5%), in 11 cases (3.9%) directly related to COVID-19. Diabetes mellitus and age at COVID-19 diagnosis > 70 years were significantly associated with COVID-19 mortality, whereas thoracic primary site with COVID-19 morbidity. A significant decrease in both hospitalization and pneumonia occurred in 2022 vs 2020. In our largest series of NEN patients with COVID-19, the NEN population is similar to the general population of patients with NEN regardless of COVID-19. However, older age, non-GEP primary sites and diabetes mellitus should be carefully considered for increased COVID-19 morbidity and mortality. Relevant information could be derived by integrating our results with NENs patients included in other cancer patients with COVID-19 registries.

Characterization of Perinatal Stem Cell Spheroids for the Development of Cell Therapy Strategy.

Type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) is a complex metabolic disease characterized by a massive loss of insulin-producing cells due to an autoimmune reaction. Currently, daily subcutaneous administration of exogenous insulin is the only effective treatment. Therefore, in recent years considerable interest has been given to stem cell therapy and in particular to the use of three-dimensional (3D) cell cultures to better reproduce in vivo conditions. The goal of this study is to provide a reliable cellular model that could be investigated for regenerative medicine applications for the replacement of insulin-producing cells in T1DM. To pursue this aim we create a co-culture spheroid of amniotic epithelial cells (AECs) and Wharton's jelly mesenchymal stromal cells (WJ-MSCs) in a one-to-one ratio. The resulting co-culture spheroids were analyzed for viability, extracellular matrix production, and hypoxic state in both early- and long-term cultures. Our results suggest that co-culture spheroids are stable in long-term culture and are still viable with a consistent extracellular matrix production evaluated with immunofluorescence staining. These findings suggest that this co-culture may potentially be differentiated into endo-pancreatic cells for regenerative medicine applications in T1DM.

The Medium Obtained from the Culture of Hodgkin Lymphoma Cells Affects the Biophysical Characteristics of a Fibroblast Cell Model.

The neoplastic Hodgkin-Reed-Sternberg (HRS) cells in Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) represent only 1-10% of cells and are surrounded by an inflammatory microenvironment. The HL cytokine network is a key point for the proliferation of HRS cells and for the maintenance of an advantageous microenvironment for HRS survival. In the tumor microenvironment (TME), the fibroblasts are involved in crosstalk with HRS cells. The aim of this work was to study the effect of lymphoma cell conditioned medium on a fibroblast cell population and evaluate modifications of cell morphology and proliferation. Hodgkin lymphoma-derived medium was used to obtain a population of "conditioned" fibroblasts (WS-1 COND). Differences in biophysical parameters were detected by the innovative device Celector®. Fibroblast-HL cells interactions were reproduced in 3D co-culture spheroids. WS-1 COND showed a different cellular morphology with an enlarged cytoplasm and enhanced metabolism. Area and diameter cell values obtained by Celector® measurement were increased. Co-culture spheroids created with WS-1 COND showed a tighter aggregation than those with non-conditioned WS-1. The presence of soluble factors derived from HRS cells in the conditioned medium was adequate for the proliferation of fibroblasts and conditioned fibroblasts in a 3D HL model allowed to develop a representative model of the in vivo TME.

Pandemic Phase-Adjusted Analysis of COVID-19 Outcomes Reveals Reduced Intrinsic Vulnerability and Substantial Vaccine Protection From Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 in Patients With Breast Cancer.

PURPOSE: Although representing the majority of newly diagnosed cancers, patients with breast cancer appear less vulnerable to COVID-19 mortality compared with other malignancies. In the absence of patients on active cancer therapy included in vaccination trials, a contemporary real-world evaluation of outcomes during the various pandemic phases, as well as of the impact of vaccination, is needed to better inform clinical practice. METHODS: We compared COVID-19 morbidity and mortality among patients with breast cancer across prevaccination (February 27, 2020-November 30, 2020), Alpha-Delta (December 1, 2020-December 14, 2021), and Omicron (December 15, 2021-January 31, 2022) phases using OnCovid registry participants (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04393974). Twenty-eight-day case fatality rate (CFR28) and COVID-19 severity were compared in unvaccinated versus double-dosed/boosted patients (vaccinated) with inverse probability of treatment weighting models adjusted for country of origin, age, number of comorbidities, tumor stage, and receipt of systemic anticancer therapy within 1 month of COVID-19 diagnosis. RESULTS: By the data lock of February 4, 2022, the registry counted 613 eligible patients with breast cancer: 60.1% (n = 312) hormone receptor-positive, 25.2% (n = 131) human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive, and 14.6% (n = 76) triple-negative. The majority (61%; n = 374) had localized/locally advanced disease. Median age was 62 years (interquartile range, 51-74 years). A total of 193 patients (31.5%) presented ≥ 2 comorbidities and 69% (n = 330) were never smokers. In total, 392 (63.9%), 164 (26.8%), and 57 (9.3%) were diagnosed during the prevaccination, Alpha-Delta, and Omicron phases, respectively. Analysis of CFR28 demonstrates comparable estimates of mortality across the three pandemic phases (13.9%, 12.2%, 5.3%, respectively; P = .182). Nevertheless, a significant improvement in outcome measures of COVID-19 severity across the three pandemic time periods was observed. Importantly, when reported separately, unvaccinated patients from the Alpha-Delta and Omicron phases achieved comparable outcomes to those from the prevaccination phase. Of 566 patients eligible for the vaccination analysis, 72 (12.7%) were fully vaccinated and 494 (87.3%) were unvaccinated. We confirmed with inverse probability of treatment weighting multivariable analysis and following a clustered robust correction for participating center that vaccinated patients achieved improved CFR28 (odds ratio [OR], 0.19; 95% CI, 0.09 to 0.40), hospitalization (OR, 0.28; 95% CI, 0.11 to 0.69), COVID-19 complications (OR, 0.16; 95% CI, 0.06 to 0.45), and reduced requirement of COVID-19-specific therapy (OR, 0.24; 95% CI, 0.09 to 0.63) and oxygen therapy (OR, 0.24; 95% CI, 0.09 to 0.67) compared with unvaccinated controls. CONCLUSION: Our findings highlight a consistent reduction of COVID-19 severity in patients with breast cancer during the Omicron outbreak in Europe. We also demonstrate that even in this population, a complete severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 vaccination course is a strong determinant of improved morbidity and mortality from COVID-19.

Immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy and outcomes from SARS-CoV-2 infection in patients with cancer: a joint analysis of OnCovid and ESMO-CoCARE registries.

BACKGROUND: As management and prevention strategies against COVID-19 evolve, it is still uncertain whether prior exposure to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) affects COVID-19 severity in patients with cancer. METHODS: In a joint analysis of ICI recipients from OnCovid (NCT04393974) and European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) CoCARE registries, we assessed severity and mortality from SARS-CoV-2 in vaccinated and unvaccinated patients with cancer and explored whether prior immune-related adverse events (irAEs) influenced outcome from COVID-19. FINDINGS: The study population consisted of 240 patients diagnosed with COVID-19 between January 2020 and February 2022 exposed to ICI within 3 months prior to COVID-19 diagnosis, with a 30-day case fatality rate (CFR30) of 23.6% (95% CI 17.8 to 30.7%). Overall, 42 (17.5%) were fully vaccinated prior to COVID-19 and experienced decreased CFR30 (4.8% vs 28.1%, p=0.0009), hospitalization rate (27.5% vs 63.2%, p<0.0001), requirement of oxygen therapy (15.8% vs 41.5%, p=0.0030), COVID-19 complication rate (11.9% vs 34.6%, p=0.0040), with a reduced need for COVID-19-specific therapy (26.3% vs 57.9%, p=0.0004) compared with unvaccinated patients. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW)-fitted multivariable analysis, following a clustered-robust correction for the data source (OnCovid vs ESMO CoCARE), confirmed that vaccinated patients experienced a decreased risk of death at 30 days (adjusted OR, aOR 0.08, 95% CI 0.01 to 0.69).Overall, 38 patients (15.8%) experienced at least one irAE of any grade at any time prior to COVID-19, at a median time of 3.2 months (range 0.13-48.7) from COVID-19 diagnosis. IrAEs occurred independently of baseline characteristics except for primary tumor (p=0.0373) and were associated with a significantly decreased CFR30 (10.8% vs 26.0%, p=0.0462) additionally confirmed by the IPTW-fitted multivariable analysis (aOR 0.47, 95% CI 0.33 to 0.67). Patients who experienced irAEs also presented a higher median absolute lymphocyte count at COVID-19 (1.4 vs 0.8 109 cells/L, p=0.0098). CONCLUSION: Anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccination reduces morbidity and mortality from COVID-19 in ICI recipients. History of irAEs might identify patients with pre-existing protection from COVID-19, warranting further investigation of adaptive immune determinants of protection from SARS-CoV-2.

Effectiveness of a phone-based nurse monitoring assessment and intervention for chemotherapy-related toxicity: A randomized multicenter trial.

Purpose: Anticancer treatment-related toxicities can impact morbidity and mortality, hamper the administration of treatment, worsen the quality of life and increase the burden on the healthcare system. Therefore, their prompt identification is crucial. NICSO (Italian Network for Supportive Care in Cancer) conducted a nationwide randomized trial to evaluate the role of a planned, weekly phone-based nurse monitoring intervention to prevent and treat chemotherapy, targeted therapy- and immunotherapy-related toxicities. Here, we report the results from the chemotherapy arm. Methods: This was a nationwide, randomized, open-label trial conducted among 29 Italian centers (NCT04726020) involving adult patients with breast, colon, or lung cancer and a life expectancy ≥6 months receiving adjuvant chemotherapy. Patients received either a weekly nurse monitoring phone call and an educational leaflet reporting practical advice about prevention and treatment of toxicities (experimental group) or the educational leaflet only (control group). Results: The addition of a nurse monitoring intervention may help reduce time spent with severe toxicities (grade ≥3), particularly those less frequently reported in clinical practice, such as fatigue. When considering grade 1-2 AEs, times with mild/moderate diarrhea, mucositis, fatigue and pain were shorter in the experimental arm. Time spent without AEs was significantly longer in the experimental arms for all the toxicities. The requirement for special medical attention was comparable between groups. Conclusion: This study suggests the need for implementing a better system of toxicity assessment and management for patients treated with adjuvant chemotherapy to promote effective preventive and/or therapeutic intervention against these events.

Myeloid nuclear differentiation antigen: an aid in differentiating lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma and splenic marginal zone lymphoma in bone marrow biopsies at presentation.

The differential diagnosis between lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma (LPL) and marginal zone B-cell lymphoma, particularly splenic type (SMZL), can be challenging on onset of bone marrow biopsy (BMB) since morphology and phenotype are not specific and clinical features can overlap or be mildly developed at diagnosis. The LPL-specific L265P mutation in the MYD88 gene is not available in all laboratories, and genetic aberrancies identified in SMZL (del7q, mutations of NOTCH2 and KLF2) are seldom searched in routine practice. The study aim is to investigate the potential role of myeloid nuclear differentiation antigen (MNDA) expression in this specific differential diagnosis. We report MNDA reactivity in 559 patients with small B-cell lymphoma including bone marrow biopsies from 90 LPL and 91 SMZL cases. MYD88 p.Leu265Pro mutation status was assessed and confirmed as positive in 24 of 90 LPL cases, which served as the test set. MNDA staining was negative in 23 of 24 LPL cases in the test set (96%). In the 157 remaining cases (66 LPL, 91 SMZL), which served as the validation set, the MYD88 p.Leu265Pro mutation was unavailable and MNDA was more frequently expressed in SMZL (p < 0.00001). In addition, immunohistochemical features more consistent with SMZL (i.e., presence of CD23+ follicular dendritic cell meshworks, polytypic plasma cells, DBA44 reactivity) were more often present in MNDA-positive cases (statistically significant for 2 such parameters). On the widest case series so far published focusing on LPL and SMZL immunohistochemical diagnosis at onset of BMB, we demonstrated that MNDA expression significantly support the diagnosis of SMZL. This observation may be of particular help in cases where the MYD88 p.Leu265Pro mutational status and/or SMZL-related genetic aberrations are unavailable.

Three-dimensional models: a novel approach for lymphoma research.

PURPOSE: Three dimensional (3D) "in vitro" models are progressively being applied to investigate tumor cell biology and the interaction of cancer cells with tumor microenvironment under conditions more similar and realistic to "in vivo" behavior than standard bidimensional (2D) cultures. METHODS: In the last years, different methods have been developed to create spheroids and organoids and each technique has advantages and limitations also based on individual needs and cell types used. This review offers an overview of methodologies used for 3D systems: scaffold-free and scaffold-based methods up to bioreactors and organ-on-chip models. RESULTS: The principal goal for researchers is to select the 3D system that best suits their needs and that reflects the tumor model they want to study. A large chapter is dedicated to the application of these models to lymphomas' study, a neoplasm still little explored in the 3D field. CONCLUSION: These innovative and advanced models may represent new tools for cancer research and pre-clinical studies of new therapies in the perspective of precision medicine.

Is Medication-Related Osteonecrosis of the Jaws (MRONJ) Associated to Cyclin-Dependent Kinase (CDK) 4/6 Inhibitors? A Word of Cautiousness. Comment on Marcianò et al. Medication-Related Osteonecrosis of the Jaws and CDK4/6 Inhibitors: A Recent Association. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 9509.

Marcianò et al. launched an alert in this journal about a possible association between medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaws (MRONJ) and cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) 4/6 inhibitors in breast cancer patients [...].

Pseudoboehmite as a drug delivery system for acyclovir.

Herpes simplex virus is among the most prevalent sexually transmitted infections. Acyclovir is a potent, selective inhibitor of herpes viruses and it is indicated for the treatment and management of recurrent cold sores on the lips and face, genital herpes, among other diseases. The problem of the oral bioavailability of acyclovir is limited because of the low permeability across the gastrointestinal membrane. The use of nanoparticles of pseudoboehmite as a drug delivery system in vitro assays is a promising approach to further the permeability of acyclovir release. Here we report the synthesis of high purity pseudoboehmite from aluminium nitrate and ammonium hydroxide containing nanoparticles, using the sol-gel method, as a drug delivery system to improve the systemic bioavailability of acyclovir. The presence of pseudoboehmite nanoparticles were verified by infrared spectroscopy, transmission electron microscopy, and X-ray diffraction techniques. In vivo tests were performed with Wistar rats to compare the release of acyclovir, with and without the addition of pseudoboehmite. The administration of acyclovir with the addition of pseudoboehmite increased the drug content by 4.6 times in the plasma of Wistar rats after 4 h administration. We determined that the toxicity of pseudoboehmite is low up to 10 mg/mL, in gel and the dried pseudoboehmite nanoparticles.